fbpx How "low-cost" will Bucharest-New York be with low-cost airlines?

How "low-cost" will Bucharest-New York be with low-cost airlines?

8 1.689
Delayed plane? Flight canceled? >>Claim compensation now<< for delayed or canceled flight. You can be entitled to up to € 600.

Starting from the news "Norwegian has announced new routes from London Gatwick to New York, Los Angeles and Fort Lauderdale / Hollywood", The Romanian press hurried to write how low-cost we will fly on the route Bucharest - New York via London. Mathematically speaking, the calculations look good, but the reality is completely different. Good, at DIGI 24 the calculations are not done correctly either, but it's another story!

bilete avion low-cost

In the first phase, I will explain low cost flights on the route London Gatwick - New York. The prices of Norwegian on transoceanic routes seem attractive, but let's not be superficial. Low-cost does not mean sharper, but less service. The rates announced by Norwegian do not include services: food on board, hold luggage and reserved space. To benefit from these additional services, you will need to remove from your pocket 38.30 EUR / segment. Without this extra package we can hardly travel. Flights between London and New York last between 6.5 and 8 hours, long enough to not serve a snack on board and a glass of water. If we make a summary calculation for the London-New York route, we will have NOTHING x NOTHING EUR + NOTHING x NOTHING EUR = NOTHING EUR - minimum tariff with taxes included and services.

Below is a London-New York roundtrip simulation. The price of 185 EUR is the lowest I have found, but this one is quite rare. So 518 EUR (with all taxes included) doesn't seem so low-cost anymore.
londra_new_york_norwegian

And now let's move on to Bucharest - London segment. Currently, 2 full-service operators (TAROM and British Airways - London Heathrow) and 3 low-cost operators (Blue Air, Wizz Air - London Luton and Flying) are flying on this route. easyJet - London Gatwick).

Norwegian will fly from London Gatwick, so easyJet would be our low-cost solution on the Bucharest-London segment. But there is a problem! The two operational programs do not match. In the summer season of 2014, easyJet will fly on Mondays, Wednesdays, Fridays and Sundays, and Norwegian on Tuesdays, Thursdays, Saturdays. That would mean staying one night in London to take him and one to return, so other costs.

But suppose it would fit. We will calculate at the minimum price: 2 x 38.12 = 76.24 EUR + 47 EUR luggage = 123.24 EUR - minimum fare for Bucharest - London (all taxes included + hold baggage).

Calculating Bucharest - New York, we have the minimum price 123.24 EUR (Bucharest-London with easyJet) + 428.60 EUR (London-New York with Norwegian) = 551.84 EUR (all taxes included and hold luggage). I repeat, this would be the minimum fare we should pay for Bucharest - New York round trip. But places are limited, so let's not have high hopes.

I did a simple simulation at British Airways, for the period August 28, 2014 - September 6, 2014 (period also chosen for the Norwegian simulation), and I found Bucharest - New York la 668 EUR (roundtrip and all taxes included + services).

bucuresti_new_york_british_august_septembrie_2014Is this difference worth the effort for low-cost flights to New York?

I think that the amount saved would be much less compared to the effort made to travel with two low-cost carriers, from Bucharest to New York. I do not recommend the effort to fly to Luton and then transfer to Gatwick. This would include the fare of the transfer train which is not cheap. There is also luggage, run / lose time and you risk losing your plane.

Let us also consider that the British fare is not among the lowest. I also found it at 650 EUR and even below. But I also remember the promotions over the year. Air France-KLM, TAP Portugal, Lufthansa etc. in September and October they had substantial reductions on the Bucharest-New York route, with prices from 430 EUR.

I recommend that you check the fares and other costs, make your calculations according to destinations and air carriers, see what opportunities you have, be careful about connections, flights, etc. As I said above, low cost means less service, but some you really need in your travels. It is often the case that low-cost is no longer as cheap as it seems.

(Cristian wrote on the same topic!)

8 Comments
  1. Ciprian says

    Congratulations!! An excellent article!
    And it tempts me to do such an analysis. A cheaper Tarom - Air France / KLM or TAP combination at the moment.
    Plus, in most articles in the press, it is mentioned that there are no Bucharest - Gatwick flights

    1. Sorin Rusi says

      Yes, there are no flights to connect with Norwegian, but I assumed that there are still :). There is more to 2014 and easyJet may think it would be interesting to match the flights.

      I don't even think about other combinations. It would be too much of a hassle flying over Luton and then transferring to Gatwick. A lot of time spent with the transfer, costs, risk of losing luggage, losing the plane… Better an AF-KLM with a stopover in Paris / Amsterdam, a Lufthansa, TAP, etc. I recommend that both flights be operated by the same carrier so as not to worry about hold baggage.

  2. Master RA says

    You were very economical, by the way! In my opinion, from experience, and especially from necessity (during flight the body becomes dehydrated), you need a lot more fluids (in 6-8 h), which are certainly not cheap. In NY, at the present time, in my opinion, the best connection is with TAP, it is also the most direct, and the conditions are ok.

    1. Sorin Rusi says

      I was economical because I wanted to show where the minimum rates start and that is not so low-cost. Inevitably, what we will experience in the future may cost more.

      And I'm preparing an article about low-cost :).

  3. Master RA says

    In my opinion, the low cost flight is, let's say ok, up to a maximum duration of 3-4 hours. The largest low-cost carrier, Air Asia, has had some attempts to fly from Asia to Europe and failed. I said, I don't see crossing the Himalayas, or the low cost ocean.

  4. Alex says

    Very good analysis, I would have said that where we take the apples we ran on pears and with many headaches in the middle. 🙂

    1. Sorin Rusi says

      Exact! I recommend low cost for short flights, when we want to travel without luggage etc. But when it comes to long flights, holidays, which involve other services, then I would recommend full-service companies. After all, we have to do calculations 🙂

  5. […] But even so, there are other expenses for passengers and other hassles. So this is how low-cost flights are no longer so low-cost, not for Romania. Let's not forget that Laker Airways, the only low-cost airline that operated […]

Leave A Reply

Your email address Will not be published.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.