Do you ignore or obey the directions of the companions on board? Do you dispute those who do not respect them?

7 351

I do not have many flights on active duty, but in those made so far, I have met different people who ignored the messages and indications of the companions on board. Such a case I encountered on the flight Bucharest - Timisoara - Bucharest. A young man was playing on the phone and ignored the message to close it. I took my heart to my teeth and brought it to my attention. I mean, my safety is above anything else.

In the last 3 years, has your flight been delayed by more than 3 hours or was your flight canceled? Apply NOW for legal damages up to € 600!

He also wrote about a similar event Maria Vasiliu. Below is the story!

On a recent flight from Chicago to Philadelphia, Melissa Brown sat next to a young passenger whose actions may or may not have led to the plane crashing. Should he have claimed it or just let him see about his business? The dilemma, as you may have guessed, refers to a traveler who refused to turn off his electronic device.

"The captain made all the announcements before the flight," recalls Brown, who works for a Philadelphia tour operator. “The upright chairs, the high tables, all the electronic devices on the off”.

Ah, but the 20 and some passengers next to her had other ideas.

"Any game he played on his cellphone was far more important than the rules we all have to follow in the plane. He went so far that he hid his phone under his hat every time the flight attendant passed by him to do the last checks before taking up the strap, "said Melissa Brown. "The mobile phone was not switched off even once during the entire flight."

The Federal Aviation Administration categorically prohibits in-flight use of wireless devices due to potential interference with the aircraft's navigation system, but also with communication systems. This regulation also includes shutting down all portable electronic devices, such as iPods and DVD players.

In the history of aviation there is no concrete case of accident caused by an electronic terminal. And regulation is about to change. At the end of last year, the director of the Federal Communications Commission sent a letter to the FAA asking for greater use of tablets, e-readers and other portable devices during the flight. For most airline passengers, this proposal seemed long awaited. It is difficult to find any tangible evidence that the use of a mobile phone or iPod would ever interfere with an airplane's navigation system. Or lead to a plane crash.

Let's get back to the dilemma. What can a passenger like Brown ultimately do? If she asks the young man to turn off the device, it may become hostile. Spending two hours next to someone who is raging has no laughter. And yet if he doesn't comply? Informing the flight attendant could turn it into an aggressive one.

I also remembered a situation from August 2012, when on the Bucharest-Timisoara flight, with Carpatair, an Italian passenger did not want in his head to give up his laptop. She continued to write emails in a cheerful way. I asked him in all the languages ​​he knew to stop. At first it was pretended that he did not understand very well what we were communicating, on the accompanying board a trick leaving the screen down at least 4 times. Before the announcement of landing, feeling in the side and the frightened looks of an older gentleman, I decided (although it is not ethical nor common sense) to take attitude. A few seconds before the new e-mail began to be drafted, I reached out to "sit my purse under the front seat better" and "accidentally" pressed the laptop's power button. Elegantly, I apologized and the Italian approved with a smile. I saw the old man breathing lightly. I think it was his first flight.

To choose not to say anything, you are indisputably complicit in violating federal law. An old federal law, but still a law. When do you say something about the behavior of another passenger? For example, should you immediately "chase" a stranger, who is near you, when he loosens his belt before completely stopping the aircraft? Or do you wait until someone clearly puts the lives of other passengers in danger?

Where do you draw the line? This is the question!

7 Comments
  1. Christian Vasile says

    You may use electronic devices, such as iPods, eReaders, or laptops, after the take-off procedures are completed, and before landing procedures begin. You must use these devices after the sign to wear the belt stops for the first time. Mobile phones are forbidden throughout the flight, that's true.

    Do I not understand the problem with a passenger who wrote emails, which he most likely did not send, because he did not have the internet?

    What about the one who plays on the phone, if it was a phone with "Airplane mode", then again, do not understand the problem?

  2. Sorin says

    The message is clear ... Gadgets closed. Oh, now that gadgets have been removed that can shut down the gsm connection or stop certain communications .. another story. The legislation has not changed yet.

    You do not know how the phone is set, what laptop it has etc. I know, it sounds like paranoia, but it is only in 2013 that the liberalization of gadgets on board aircraft and the general liberalization on airplanes with special communication systems installed will be discussed. The Internet will be available on more and more aircraft and airlines.

  3. Christian Vasile says

    Nope, the message says that all gadgets must be turned off "during take-off and landing," and that mobile phones and devices of this type must be kept in Airplane Mode or shut down throughout the flight. Devices like iPods or e-Readers are allowed during the flight 🙂

  4. ease says

    Airlines require gadgets to be closed ONLY during take-off and landing, or when the seat belt coupling signal is lit simply for passengers to be receptive to what is happening and to be easily communicated if it occurs. an unforeseen event, otherwise it is not a problem to button your laptop, phone, tablet or whatever else you want. It has nothing to do with transmission waves, think of them as airlines that offer you wireless in-flight (eg some Norwegian Airlines flights).

  5. Sorin says

    With regard to the internet on board the aircraft, some special equipment is mounted and some insulation is made regarding the electrical system of the airplane. There are many companies that now offer internet on board aircraft and it will be generalized.

    In conjunction with federal law in the United States, it is required to stop gadgets throughout the flight. It is true that there were no incidents due to gadgets, at least not until now. But it also takes into account that the Li-ion batteries have a strange behavior at 10 000 meters. See also the case of 787 aircraft. There are still studies on these issues.

    The idea of ​​the article was related to legislation and its compliance ... Whether you sanction passengers who ignore these rules or not!

  6. Nicky Predescu says

    I tell him to see his own work, we would all be happier and less stressed like that.

  7. Sorin Rusi says

    Yes? Well then I say to light a cigarette in the plane, fixed next to you, to see how much you support me in a flight of 3 hours. Eventually I can open my 2-3 gadgets, so I extend them to you. It will be comfortable, I think :).

    If we have to see each other, that means limitation in action, isolation ... I don't like living in isolation :), and my life is above all else. So It would be good to act when we see an illegality, whether it is on the plane or on the ground ...

Leave A Reply

Your email address Will not be published.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Chinese (Traditional)EnglishFrenchGermanitalianportugueseRomanianrussianEspañolturkish