A TAROM aircraft involved in an incident at Iasi airport

A TAROM airship departed from the runway of the Iasi airport on landing

8 263

According to a mediafax correspondent, on Saturday night a TAROM airliner departed slightly from the runway of the Iasi airport at the landing, but was immediately recovered by the pilots. The aircraft was conducting the Bucharest - Iasi flight.

The causes that led to this small incident are still unknown, at this time being investigated by the aeronautical authorities. The incident was reported to the Civil Aviation Safety Investigation and Analysis Center within the Ministry of Transport, which will initiate an investigation in this case.

After recovery, the aircraft ran smoothly to the landing gate. There were no injuries!

The Iaşi - Bucharest return flight was operated with another TAROM specially sent aircraft. The plane involved in the incident left empty, on Sunday morning, towards Bucharest.

Update 13.08.2012: On August 11 2012, the TAROM YR-ATH aircraft, which operated the RO 709 Bucharest-Iaşi flight, left the runway slightly during the braking procedure, after landing. The 54 passengers did not experience this event and were disembarked normally, in complete safety.

On the spot, a technical check was requested, after which it was found that the aircraft can go to the usual parking position.

In order to find out the causes of this event, a commission of inquiry was set up, the investigation being carried out.

  1. Master Ra says

    As I know Iasi is flying with ATR, and found the other Tarom ATR to send to Iasi, but to Tenerife what to send passengers to take A310, manufactured in 1990? When Turkish had problems with an engine at B777-300 (very strange!), He sent an A340 to Saigon-HCMc!

  2. Sorin says

    Well it was an ATR 72-500 in Iasi, but it wasn't serious. Low rain, wet track, probably a small error of maneuver.

    As for Tenerife, 2 Boeing aircraft were sent, but the problem was solved and it came with A310.

    1. Master Ra says

      The problem was solved after a few days, not hours! That 2 planes were being sent, it's a bit believable, for that the Tarom does not have enough planes, to allow 2 to take off, one day, from the flight schedule. I think it was simpler, maybe even more civilized, for the passengers to be injured (they have no fault, they paid for some services-AND DON'T HAVE TO WAIT FOR TAROM), and eventually get compensated! This is how we proceed in the civilized world, which unfortunately, we do not manage to reach too!

      1. Sorin says

        According to the laws, it was done correctly. And there were no days, it was about 24 hours. And TAROM has the possibility to send 2 aircraft in case of force majeure. Plus there were other solutions, but there was no need ... The problem was fixed and everything is ok.

        Let's not be pissed off and see that TAROM does the right thing. See international cases, see bankruptcy cases, such situations have happened in larger houses. It is something that is provided by legislation. I can say that TAROM solved the case very well compared to other larger companies.

      2. Sorin says
  3. Sorin says

    TAROM problems ... I think it was a simple coincidence with the 2 more unpleasant events.

  4. Master Ra says

    They are not junk, but if other companies went bankrupt, it does not mean that Tarom has done it correctly! And I say that I am not carcotas, but tell me how he sent the same day, 2 B737 aircraft - other types of aircraft from the fleet of Tarom, ATR and A318, do not reach Tenerife than with more excal -. As you well know, Tarom only has 9 B737 (here are also B737-300, which I don't know if I can fly without a stopover in Tenerife!), These planes ensure, I think, about 90% of the daily external flights of Tarom. Let's just say that there was no Tarom B737 in maintenance, I don't see how the Tarom can miss 2 between them. I repeat, I do not know if B 737-300 arrives in Tenerife (there are about 6 h of non-stop flight), then only 5 planes remain, and I cannot see how the Tarom can miss 45% of the flight capacity in a day - I mean B737 + B738.
    I am not a jerk, as an example I tell you, it was the time I was a Senator at the Star Alliance, and in Istanbul we were flying with the Tarom, even if it was a little more expensive, or especially, even if we were flying with ATR - long ago, or crowded with A318 current. Turquoise flies / flies with B 738 or A320, and you think you know, that there is a very big difference between planes, even if they fly less than 1h.

  5. Sorin says

    I am referring to the fact that other companies have problems and nobody does as much tragedy as is done in Romania or how you expressed yourself.

    As for aircraft management, I think TAROM is doing better than me or you.

    And part of what they communicated on that date!

    “In the event of failure to remedy the failure, passengers will be transported to Bucharest by one of the following options: contracting an aircraft locally or, if no aircraft is available locally, sending two TAROM type aircraft Boeing 737 - 700. ”

    So let's not put the TAROM or other operator in the wheel unless we know exactly what happened. As long as the lives of the passengers were not endangered, TAROM counselor managed the problem correctly.

Leave A Reply

Your email address Will not be published.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.